Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ital.sp.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/507
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorJunqueira, Valeria Christina Amstalden-
dc.contributor.authorCantúsio Neto, Romeu-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Neusely da-
dc.contributor.authorTerra, Juliana Hirata-
dc.contributor.otherPT_Br
dc.date.accessioned-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T20:04:28Z-
dc.date.availablePT_Br
dc.date.available2022-11-03T20:04:28Z-
dc.date.copyright-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifierPT_Br
dc.identifier.citationWater Science & Technology, London, v. 65, n. 2, p. 227-232, 2012. Doi: 10.2166/WSL2012.758.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ital.sp.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/507-
dc.description.abstractFour methods for enumerating Clostridium perfringens spores in water were evaluated: (1) the IMM (Iron Milk Medium) method (MPN); (2) the LS (Lactose Sulfite Broth) method (MPN); (3) the m-CP (membrane filtration Clostridium perfringens Agar) method (membrane filtration); and (4) the TSC (Tryptose Sulfite Cycloserine Agar) method (membrane filtration). The performance of these methods was compared with that of the DRCM (Differential Reinforced Clostridium Medium) method (MPN) as adopted by CETESB (Brazil's Environmental Sanitation Technology Company) for the analysis of C. perfringens spores in water, statistical analysis was performed according to ISO 17994:2004 (Water Quality - Criteria for Establishing Equivalence between Microbiological Methods). The LS, m-CP, and TSC methods were considered not equivalent to the DRCM method, as they gave significantly lower results. The IMM showed inconclusive results and, according to ISO 17994:2004, analysis of a greater number of samples is needed to draw definitive conclusions comparing IMM and DRCM.pt_BR
dc.formatPT_Br
dc.languagePT_Br
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.rightsPT_Br
dc.sourcePT_Br
dc.subjectAnalytical methodspt_BR
dc.subjectClostridium perfringenspt_BR
dc.subjectSpore countpt_BR
dc.subjectWaterpt_BR
dc.titleComparison of methods for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens spores in waterpt_BR
dc.typeArticlept_BR
dc.date.updated-
dc.subject.cnpqPT_Br
dc.contributor.CRUESPPT_Br
dc.subjec.otherlanguage
dc.subject.wosPT_Br
dc.identifier.italrecordnumber-
dc.creator.idPT_Br
dc.contributor.authoremailPT_Br
dc.contributor.authoritalPT_Br
dc.contributor.authorexternalPT_Br
dc.contributor.nameofprogramPT_Br
dc.contributor.institutionPT_Br
dc.contributor.eventPT_Br
dc.publisher.cityPT_Br
dc.publisher.countryPT_Br
dc.date.monthofcirculation-
dc.description.areaofknowledgePT_Br
dc.description.referencesPT_Br
dc.description.referencePT_Br
dc.description.sponsorPT_Br
dc.description.sponsor-standardPT_Br
dc.description.sponsorremissivePT_Br
dc.description.sponsordocumentnumberPT_Br
dc.description.volumePT_Br
dc.description.volumesupplementPT_Br
dc.description.issuenumber-
dc.description.issuesupplementPT_Br
dc.description.issuespecialPT_Br
dc.description.firstpagePT_Br
dc.description.lastpagePT_Br
dc.rights.accessrightsPT_Br
dc.identifie.eissnPT_Br
dc.identifie.wosPT_Br
dc.identifie.doiPT_Br
dc.identifie.doiPT_Br
dc.identifie.urlPT_Br
dc.identifie.localPT_Br
dc.format.supportPT_Br
dc.creator.orcidPT_Br
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos Científicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Comparison of methods for the enumeration....pdf613.72 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.